
Will Russia enter Sloviansk by December 31, 2026?
5 of 5 top Polymarket traders hold No (100%) · No at 94¢ · $6K held · ends Jan 1, 2027
🔬
Research candidate
No
5
No 100%
$5.9K
$1.0K
76.9¢ → 93.5¢
+22% since entry · 5 traders
Research grade
Research candidateNo at 94%
Matches a rule that looked positive after costs in the short windows of our Oct 22 2026 backtest. The full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found no evidence for any of these rules: out of sample they lost money or were noise. A label for a pattern that once looked good, not an edge and not a recommendation.
- Quality net +3 or moreNot confirmed. Oct 22 backtest: net +3 when the consensus formed made +7.2 % a trade (n 358), with 5 events giving two thirds of it. Full year, out of sample, the closest rule (3+ proven winners, two thirds on the side) lost −1.9 % a trade (n 49,161, 95 % CI −2.6 to −1.1).
- Favourite (60–95¢)Full year, out of sample: 0.70–0.90 lost −0.9 % a trade (n 26,050, 95 % CI −1.5 to −0.3): the least bad band, still a loss. The Oct 22 backtest's +0.4 % (n 4,327) was not confirmed.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
5 of 5 top traders (100%)1 small position dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
5 traders
Top 2 hold 86%
Freshness
Late
819h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
100% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 86% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL SlenderMan | Noavg 75.4¢ | $3.2K | $3.9K | +$758.98 | 72% 257-102 (359) |
![]() BloodyMummer | Noavg 75.2¢ | $930.24 | $1.2K | +$226.05 | 77% 557-167 (724) |
![]() DumplingBMF | Noavg 90.6¢ | $495.38 | $463.18 | +$14.45 | 68% 1830-849 (2679) |
0X 0x91c363acd95bb150d4fd28912737eaf6125b409f | Noavg 78.3¢ | $199.99 | $238.81 | +$38.81 | 69% 156-69 (225) |
![]() Donny.T<$100 | Noavg 89.6¢ | $89.98 | $93.88 | +$3.9 | 72% 484-187 (671) |
Invested
$3,161.32
Value
$3.9K
PnL
+$758.98
Record
72%
257-102 (359)
BloodyMummerInvested
$930.24
Value
$1.2K
PnL
+$226.05
Record
77%
557-167 (724)
DumplingBMFInvested
$495.38
Value
$463.18
PnL
+$14.45
Record
68%
1830-849 (2679)
Invested
$199.99
Value
$238.81
PnL
+$38.81
Record
69%
156-69 (225)
Donny.T<$100Invested
$89.98
Value
$93.88
PnL
+$3.9
Record
72%
484-187 (671)
Chat
Sign in with your wallet to post.
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
93.5¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + no taker fee. Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.