Smart money holds the underdog side
Most tracked traders hold Yes, while the market favors No (100%). 6 of 6 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.
Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.
Will Republicans win Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, and Ohio, and lose Texas?
6 of 6 top Polymarket traders hold Yes (100%) · Yes at 0.5¢ · $8K held · ends Nov 3
⚠️
Avoid
Yes
6
Yes 100%
$7.8K
$-2.7K
0.7¢ → 0.5¢
-23% since entry · 6 traders
Research grade
AvoidYes at 1%
Matches a pattern that lost clearly more than the plain consensus in our tests.
- Consensus side under 30¢Full year, out of sample: 0.05–0.30 lost −8.1 % a trade (n 11,568), under 0.20 −20.5 % (n 3,615). Oct 22 backtest: −29.5 % (n 1,625). The strongest effect in every test.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
6 of 6 top traders (100%)Underdog side (market favors No 100%)6 hold an outcome priced under 50%4 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
6 traders
Top 2 hold 99%
Freshness
Late
52h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
100% of non-arb traders are on Yes. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 99% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BR BreakTheBankCTR | Yesavg 0.7¢ | $9.6K | $7.2K | $-2.4K | 44% 577-748 (1325) |
SN SnapElectionAvoiderCTR | Yesavg 0.5¢ | $758.93 | $532.64 | -$162.31 | 50% 1219-1210 (2429) |
0X 0x66E7ce01C6831B8A2503D09eDD6167152Ee68BcD-1771870353938CTR<$100 | Yesavg 0.8¢ | $90.07 | $58.44 | -$31.63 | 45% 2312-2836 (5148) |
 ArmageddonRewardsBillyCTR<$100 | Yesavg 0.8¢ | $62.5 | $40 | -$22.5 | 56% 15513-12121 (27634) |
WA WarriorHCTR<$100 | Yesavg 0.8¢ | $8.81 | $5.64 | -$3.17 | 17% 1014-4846 (5860) |
XT xtxpleasecallmeCTR<$100 | Yesavg 0.7¢ | $5.79 | $4.33 | -$49.55 | 35% 16906-31245 (48151) |
Invested
$9,562.57
Value
$7.2K
PnL
$-2.4K
Record
44%
577-748 (1325)
Invested
$758.93
Value
$532.64
PnL
-$162.31
Record
50%
1219-1210 (2429)
Invested
$90.07
Value
$58.44
PnL
-$31.63
Record
45%
2312-2836 (5148)
ArmageddonRewardsBillyCTR<$100Invested
$62.5
Value
$40
PnL
-$22.5
Record
56%
15513-12121 (27634)
Invested
$8.81
Value
$5.64
PnL
-$3.17
Record
17%
1014-4846 (5860)
Invested
$5.79
Value
$4.33
PnL
-$49.55
Record
35%
16906-31245 (48151)
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
0.5¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.1¢ fee (Politics 4%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.