
Pakistan military action against Yemen by October 31, 2026?
3 of 7 top Polymarket traders hold No (43%) · No at 99¢ · $3K held · ended Oct 31
⚖️
Neutral
No
7
No 43%
$2.7K
$-1.0K
91.1¢ → 98.6¢
+8% since entry · 3 traders
Research grade
NeutralNo at 99%
No measured edge, which here means a loss: the plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −3.0 % a trade after costs out of sample in the full-year test (n 86,296, 95 % CI −3.6 to −2.4 %).
- Side priced over 95¢Full year, out of sample: 0.90–0.95 −0.2 % a trade (n 12,989, 95 % CI −0.6 to +0.3); above 95¢ little is left to win and the tests stop at 0.95.
- Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
3 of 7 top traders (43%)4 hold an outcome priced under 50%3 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
3 traders
Top 2 hold 98%
Freshness
Late
641h old
Flip Quality
Choppy
6 consensus flips
43% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 98% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M2 M2sx92kljs42 | Noavg 94.9¢ | $2.2K | $2.3K | +$84.41 | 73% 350-129 (479) |
![]() smellyEllie | Noavg 65¢ | $161.6 | $245.07 | +$83.48 | 50% 970-988 (1958) |
AR Arman2CTR | Yesavg 24.3¢ | $1.1K | $66.5 | $-1.0K | 58% 332-242 (574) |
![]() Relaccsed<$100 | Noavg 47.6¢ | $28.9 | $48.51 | +$19.61 | 56% 1213-967 (2180) |
![]() PaddyAlphaCTR | Yesavg 9.1¢ | $177.1 | $30.89 | -$146.21 | 59% 986-684 (1670) |
![]() viniiCTR<$100 | Yesavg 4¢ | $4 | $1.45 | -$2.55 | 74% 2792-1005 (3797) |
![]() randomWalkingShrimpCTR<$100 | Yesavg 11¢ | $5.52 | $0.73 | -$4.79 | 77% 1204-366 (1570) |
Invested
$2,185
Value
$2.3K
PnL
+$84.41
Record
73%
350-129 (479)
smellyEllieInvested
$161.6
Value
$245.07
PnL
+$83.48
Record
50%
970-988 (1958)
Invested
$1,112.35
Value
$66.5
PnL
$-1.0K
Record
58%
332-242 (574)
Relaccsed<$100Invested
$28.9
Value
$48.51
PnL
+$19.61
Record
56%
1213-967 (2180)
PaddyAlphaCTRInvested
$177.1
Value
$30.89
PnL
-$146.21
Record
59%
986-684 (1670)
viniiCTR<$100Invested
$4
Value
$1.45
PnL
-$2.55
Record
74%
2792-1005 (3797)
randomWalkingShrimpCTR<$100Invested
$5.52
Value
$0.73
PnL
-$4.79
Record
77%
1204-366 (1570)
Chat
Sign in with your wallet to post.
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
98.6¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + no taker fee. Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.