Skip to content
PolyConsensus
← Traders

Compare traders

Two to four tracked traders side by side: their record on consensus markets, where they are strongest, what prices they buy at, how often they side with the consensus and the markets they hold together right now.

Traders side by side
abc5100100gringo00BreakTheBank
Record (consensus markets)83% (57–12, n=69)75% (6–2, n=8)45% (526–640, n=1166)
Consensus PnL$19K$3.5M$10.6M
Tracked asPM monthly #926was PM monthly #19PM monthly #1
Sides with the consensus33% (1 of 3 open)no open consensus position74% (72 of 97 open)
Strongest topics
  • NFL +48 pts n=33, ROI +46%
  • Soccer +18 pts n=17, ROI +14%
none with 10+ settled
  • NFL +50 pts n=123, ROI +50%
  • NBA +49 pts n=93, ROI +48%
  • Soccer +41 pts n=277, ROI +38%
Weakest topic———
Settled positions, side won94% of 50 at avg 56¢, ROI +41%86% of 7 at avg 59¢, ROI +25%98% of 539 at avg 53¢, ROI +41%
Entries under 30¢2% (won 0% of 1)0%10% (won 85% of 53)
Entries 30–50¢38% (won 95% of 19)0%36% (won 98% of 192)
Entries 50–70¢44% (won 95% of 22)100% (won 86% of 7)35% (won 99% of 187)
Entries 70¢ and up16% (won 100% of 8)0%20% (won 100% of 107)

Records and specialties count consensus markets only and run optimistic: Polymarket's closed-position data rarely lists bets that went to zero. Edge = how much more often the held side won than its entry price implied.

Markets they hold together now

0 on the same side, 3 on opposite sides. Opposite sides first.

Marketabc5100100gringo00BreakTheBank
Will Republicans win Iowa, and lose Alaska, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas?
opposite sides · consensus No
No $2.3K—Yes $82K
Will Republicans win Iowa and Kansas, and lose Alaska, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas?
opposite sides · consensus Yes
No $4.6K—Yes $51K
Will Republicans win Iowa, Kansas, and Maine, and lose Alaska, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas?
opposite sides · consensus Yes
No $42—Yes $16K