Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
← Traders

Compare traders

Two to four tracked traders side by side: their record on consensus markets, where they are strongest, what prices they buy at, how often they side with the consensus and the markets they hold together right now.

Traders side by side
darkumbreon88BreakTheBank00gringo00CORGII
Record (consensus markets)66% (1800–947, n=2747)45% (542–652, n=1194)75% (6–2, n=8)61% (394–247, n=641)
Consensus PnL$177K$10.6M$3.5M$4.5M
Tracked aswas PM monthly #806PM monthly #1was PM monthly #19PM monthly #68
Sides with the consensus56% (5 of 9 open)90% (143 of 159 open)no open consensus position0% (0 of 1 open)
Strongest topics
  • MLB +43 pts n=44, ROI +45%
  • NFL +36 pts n=89, ROI +29%
  • Tennis +32 pts n=211, ROI +31%
  • NFL +51 pts n=134, ROI +50%
  • NBA +49 pts n=93, ROI +48%
  • Soccer +40 pts n=279, ROI +38%
none with 10+ settled
Weakest topic————
Settled positions, side won100% of 1605 at avg 69¢, ROI +35%97% of 552 at avg 53¢, ROI +41%86% of 7 at avg 59¢, ROI +25%98% of 399 at avg 46¢, ROI +55%
Entries under 30¢1% (won 100% of 18)10% (won 82% of 56)0%9% (won 92% of 36)
Entries 30–50¢10% (won 100% of 158)36% (won 98% of 198)0%56% (won 99% of 223)
Entries 50–70¢38% (won 100% of 605)35% (won 99% of 191)100% (won 86% of 7)33% (won 100% of 133)
Entries 70¢ and up51% (won 100% of 824)19% (won 100% of 107)0%2% (won 100% of 7)

Records and specialties count consensus markets only and run optimistic: Polymarket's closed-position data rarely lists bets that went to zero. Edge = how much more often the held side won than its entry price implied.

Markets they hold together now

0 on the same side, 1 on opposite sides. Opposite sides first.

Marketdarkumbreon88BreakTheBank00gringo00CORGII
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group B
opposite sides · consensus Aurora Gaming
Aurora Gaming $2.0K——Liquid $22K