
Will the Republican Party candidate win the 2026 South Carolina Senate election by 10%-15%?
4 of 7 top Polymarket traders hold No (57%) · No at 100¢ · $521 held · ended Nov 4
⚖️
Neutral
No
7
No 57%
$521.14
-$2.12
93.9¢ → 99.8¢
+6% since entry · 4 traders
Research grade
NeutralNo at 100%
No measured edge, which here means a loss: the plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −3.0 % a trade after costs out of sample in the full-year test (n 86,296, 95 % CI −3.6 to −2.4 %).
- Side priced over 95¢Full year, out of sample: 0.90–0.95 −0.2 % a trade (n 12,989, 95 % CI −0.6 to +0.3); above 95¢ little is left to win and the tests stop at 0.95.
- Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
4 of 7 top traders (57%)3 hold an outcome priced under 50%6 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
4 traders
Top 2 hold 89%
Freshness
Mature
28h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
57% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 89% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0X 0x66E7ce01C6831B8A2503D09eDD6167152Ee68BcD-1771870353938 | Noavg 96.4¢ | $381.04 | $381.28 | +$0.24 | 45% 2914-3563 (6477) |
CI cigarettes<$100 | Noavg 85.8¢ | $69.15 | $79.83 | +$10.68 | 53% 23170-20401 (43571) |
BR BreakTheBank<$100 | Noavg 90.1¢ | $44.5 | $49.3 | +$4.79 | 42% 630-874 (1504) |
SM smallreceipt<$100 | Noavg 79¢ | $7.9 | $9.98 | +$2.08 | 49% 8980-9510 (18490) |
SH shiifooCTR<$100 | Yesavg 7.2¢ | $14.44 | $0.67 | -$13.77 | 59% 3795-2636 (6431) |
AN AnonymousUsernameCTR<$100 | Yesavg 12.9¢ | $23.42 | $0.05 | -$2.98 | 69% 7195-3179 (10374) |
![]() LornaPredictsCTR<$100 | Yesavg 16¢ | $3.2 | $0.04 | -$3.16 | 20% 2785-10964 (13749) |
Invested
$381.04
Value
$381.28
PnL
+$0.24
Record
45%
2914-3563 (6477)
Invested
$69.15
Value
$79.83
PnL
+$10.68
Record
53%
23170-20401 (43571)
Invested
$44.5
Value
$49.3
PnL
+$4.79
Record
42%
630-874 (1504)
Invested
$7.9
Value
$9.98
PnL
+$2.08
Record
49%
8980-9510 (18490)
Invested
$14.44
Value
$0.67
PnL
-$13.77
Record
59%
3795-2636 (6431)
Invested
$23.42
Value
$0.05
PnL
-$2.98
Record
69%
7195-3179 (10374)
LornaPredictsCTR<$100Invested
$3.2
Value
$0.04
PnL
-$3.16
Record
20%
2785-10964 (13749)
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
99.8¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.0¢ fee (Politics 4%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.