Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
← Traders

Compare traders

Two to four tracked traders side by side: their record on consensus markets, where they are strongest, what prices they buy at, how often they side with the consensus and the markets they hold together right now.

Traders side by side
00gringo00BreakTheBankndb1whig
Record (consensus markets)no settled market46% (555–663, n=1218)65% (882–468, n=1350)62% (365–221, n=586)
Consensus PnL—$11.2M$4.2M$326K
Tracked as—PM monthly #2PM monthly #143PM monthly #973
Sides with the consensusno open consensus position66% (21 of 32 open)78% (25 of 32 open)52% (11 of 21 open)
Strongest topicsnot computed yet
  • NFL +51 pts n=141, ROI +50%
  • NBA +49 pts n=96, ROI +47%
  • Soccer +40 pts n=280, ROI +38%
Weakest topic——NFL −9 pts, n=139Finance −7 pts, n=26
Settled positions, side won—97% of 563 at avg 53¢, ROI +41%64% of 1288 at avg 64¢, ROI +4%47% of 622 at avg 40¢, ROI +6%
Entries under 30¢—10% (won 81% of 57)13% (won 15% of 168)45% (won 13% of 280)
Entries 30–50¢—36% (won 98% of 201)20% (won 39% of 256)18% (won 43% of 109)
Entries 50–70¢—35% (won 99% of 196)24% (won 58% of 314)13% (won 81% of 79)
Entries 70¢ and up—19% (won 100% of 109)43% (won 93% of 550)25% (won 95% of 154)

Records and specialties count consensus markets only and run optimistic: Polymarket's closed-position data rarely lists bets that went to zero. Edge = how much more often the held side won than its entry price implied.

Markets they hold together now

1 on the same side, 1 on opposite sides. Opposite sides first.

Market00gringo00BreakTheBankndb1whig
Will Republicans lose the Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas Senate seats?
opposite sides · consensus No
—No $407K—Yes $8.7K
Will Republicans win Alaska, and lose Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Ohio, and Texas?
same side · consensus No
—Yes $261K—Yes $1.3K