Skip to content
PolyConsensus
← Traders

Compare traders

Two to four tracked traders side by side: their record on consensus markets, where they are strongest, what prices they buy at, how often they side with the consensus and the markets they hold together right now.

Traders side by side
relativesignificanceRN1CORGIIsainttroplay
Record (consensus markets)58% (96–70, n=166)48% (12823–13908, n=26731)62% (393–245, n=638)71% (10–4, n=14)
Consensus PnL$15K$13.4M$4.5M$4.4M
Tracked aswas PM monthly #926PM monthly #24 + pinnedPM monthly #68was PM monthly #11
Sides with the consensus64% (7 of 11 open)63% (20 of 32 open)25% (1 of 4 open)no open consensus position
Strongest topics
Weakest topic————
Settled positions, side won91% of 117 at avg 55¢, ROI +24%94% of 24664 at avg 58¢, ROI +35%98% of 399 at avg 46¢, ROI +55%100% of 10 at avg 49¢, ROI +52%
Entries under 30¢6% (won 86% of 7)10% (won 56% of 2534)9% (won 92% of 36)0%
Entries 30–50¢39% (won 87% of 46)22% (won 94% of 5497)56% (won 99% of 223)50% (won 100% of 5)
Entries 50–70¢27% (won 94% of 32)36% (won 99% of 8897)33% (won 100% of 133)50% (won 100% of 5)
Entries 70¢ and up27% (won 97% of 32)31% (won 100% of 7736)2% (won 100% of 7)0%

Records and specialties count consensus markets only and run optimistic: Polymarket's closed-position data rarely lists bets that went to zero. Edge = how much more often the held side won than its entry price implied.

Markets they hold together now

1 on the same side, 2 on opposite sides. Opposite sides first.

MarketrelativesignificanceRN1CORGIIsainttroplay
Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs Liquid (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group B
opposite sides · consensus Aurora Gaming
Aurora Gaming $1.5K—Liquid $11K—
Counter-Strike: Legacy vs TheMongolz (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group A
opposite sides · consensus TheMongolz
Legacy $53—TheMongolz $2.2K—
Counter-Strike: Heroic vs B8 (BO3) - IEM Beijing Group A
same side · consensus Heroic
B8 $2.4K—B8 $22K—