Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
Back to Markets

Exact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 0 Manchester City FC?

7 of 13 top Polymarket traders hold No (54%) · No at 95¢ · $8K held · ends Nov 7

Yes5¢No95¢Ends Sat, Nov 7, 2026View on Polymarket
SIGNAL

⚖️

Neutral

No

Consensus Traders

13

No 54%

1 arb excluded

Total Value

$8.5K

Combined PnL

-$460.5

Smart Money Entry

95¢ → 95.2¢

+0% since entry · 6 traders

Research grade

NeutralNo at 95%

No measured edge, which here means a loss: the plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −3.0 % a trade after costs out of sample in the full-year test (n 86,296, 95 % CI −3.6 to −2.4 %).

  • Side priced over 95¢Full year, out of sample: 0.90–0.95 −0.2 % a trade (n 12,989, 95 % CI −0.6 to +0.3); above 95¢ little is left to win and the tests stop at 0.95.
  • Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.
  • Quality net +3 or moreNot confirmed. Oct 22 backtest: net +3 when the consensus formed made +7.2 % a trade (n 358), with 5 events giving two thirds of it. Full year, out of sample, the closest rule (3+ proven winners, two thirds on the side) lost −1.9 % a trade (n 49,161, 95 % CI −2.6 to −1.1).

The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.

Smart Money Signal

No

7 of 13 top traders (54%)1 arbitrage trader dimmed6 hold an outcome priced under 50%8 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)

Market Activity

Outcome Probabilities

Yes5%
No95%

Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome

No7 traders
Total Value$7.6K
Total Shares7,982
Combined PnL-$13.23
Yes6 traders
Total Value$154.13
Total Shares3,211
Combined PnL-$447.28
No — 54%Yes — 46%

Signal Intelligence

Momentum

Flat

+0 pts consensus

Breadth

7 traders

Top 2 hold 94%

Freshness

Mature

13h old

Flip Quality

Watch

2 consensus flips

Breadth vs concentrationCrowded

54% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 94% of that side's value.

Cohort consensusHand-picked vs top 1000 · whales, sharps, snipers, contrarians
whaleYes 67% · 3
Diverging
sharpNo 100% · 3
Aligned
ctrYes 100% · 3
Diverging
Top 1000No 54% · 13
Aligned

Chat

EV Calculator

Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.

Break-even chance96.4%

95.2¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.2¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.

Expected Value—
Expected ROIenter your estimate
Max Profit
+$3.75
Max Loss
-$100.00
Shares
103.8

A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.

Market Info

Condition ID
0x6561531b...9a9dc4
Slug
epl-not-mac-2026-11-07-exact-score-0-0
Trade on Polymarket