Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
← Traders

Compare traders

Two to four tracked traders side by side: their record on consensus markets, where they are strongest, what prices they buy at, how often they side with the consensus and the markets they hold together right now.

Traders side by side
0x1F85EB9C455c5BDEF5D96C2739076678c7157B02-1778811447702beachboy4CORGIIBreakTheBank
Record (consensus markets)35% (168–314, n=482)68% (43–20, n=63)61% (395–248, n=643)45% (542–652, n=1194)
Consensus PnL$34K$5.8M$194K$11.0M
Tracked asPM monthly #138was PM monthly #24PM monthly #68PM monthly #1
Sides with the consensus62% (26 of 42 open)100% (1 of 1 open)no open consensus position91% (150 of 165 open)
Strongest topics
  • NHL +27 pts n=13, ROI +19%
  • Soccer +10 pts n=81, ROI +5%
  • NFL +51 pts n=134, ROI +50%
  • NBA +49 pts n=93, ROI +48%
  • Soccer +40 pts n=279, ROI +38%
Weakest topicElections ±0 pts, n=174NBA −6 pts, n=93——
Settled positions, side won61% of 1344 at avg 61¢, ROI +1%57% of 213 at avg 54¢, ROI +3%98% of 399 at avg 46¢, ROI +55%97% of 552 at avg 53¢, ROI +41%
Entries under 30¢37% (won 2% of 495)3% (won 17% of 6)9% (won 92% of 36)10% (won 82% of 56)
Entries 30–50¢2% (won 35% of 31)30% (won 57% of 63)56% (won 99% of 223)36% (won 98% of 198)
Entries 50–70¢2% (won 84% of 31)54% (won 51% of 115)33% (won 100% of 133)35% (won 99% of 191)
Entries 70¢ and up59% (won 99% of 787)14% (won 86% of 29)2% (won 100% of 7)19% (won 100% of 107)

Records and specialties count consensus markets only and run optimistic: Polymarket's closed-position data rarely lists bets that went to zero. Edge = how much more often the held side won than its entry price implied.

Markets they hold together now

0 on the same side, 1 on opposite sides. Opposite sides first.

Market0x1F85EB9C455c5BDEF5D96C2739076678c7157B02-1778811447702beachboy4CORGIIBreakTheBank
Will the Democratic Party control the Senate after the 2026 Midterm elections?
opposite sides · consensus Yes
No $1.1K——Yes $274K