Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
Back to Markets

Smart money holds the underdog side

Most tracked traders hold No, while the market favors Yes (99%). 4 of 12 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.

Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Exact Score: Al Hazem SC 0 - 0 Al Nassr Saudi Club?

4 of 12 top Polymarket traders hold No (33%) · No at 1.1¢ · $32K held · ends Nov 6

Yes99¢No1¢Ends Fri, Nov 6, 2026View on Polymarket
SIGNAL

⚠️

Avoid

No

Consensus Traders

12

No 33%

Total Value

$31.8K

Combined PnL

$13.64

Smart Money Entry

70.1¢ → 1.1¢

-98% since entry · 4 traders

Research grade

AvoidNo at 1%

Matches a pattern that lost clearly more than the plain consensus in our tests.

  • Consensus side under 30¢Full year, out of sample: 0.05–0.30 lost −8.1 % a trade (n 11,568), under 0.20 −20.5 % (n 3,615). Oct 22 backtest: −29.5 % (n 1,625). The strongest effect in every test.
  • Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.

The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.

Smart Money Signal

No

4 of 12 top traders (33%)Underdog side (market favors Yes 99%)4 hold an outcome priced under 50%2 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)

Market Activity

Outcome Probabilities

Yes99%
No1%

Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome

Yes8 traders
Total Value$31.6K
Total Shares31,989
Combined PnL+$17.6K
No4 traders
Total Value$293.39
Total Shares25,513
Combined PnL$-17.6K
Yes — 67%No — 33%

Signal Intelligence

Momentum

Building

-3 pts consensus

Breadth

4 traders

Top 2 hold 97%

Freshness

Late

54h old

Flip Quality

Clean

0 consensus flips

Breadth vs concentrationCrowded

33% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 97% of that side's value.

Cohort consensusHand-picked vs top 1000 · whales, sharps, snipers, contrarians
The hand-picked list (3 on No) and the top 1000 (11 on Yes) disagree here.
whaleYes 100% · 1
Diverging
sharpYes 100% · 4
Diverging
ctrYes 63% · 8
Diverging
Hand-pickedNo 67% · 3
Aligned
Top 1000Yes 73% · 11
Diverging

Chat

EV Calculator

Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.

Break-even chance2.3%

1.1¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.1¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.

Expected Value—
Expected ROIenter your estimate
Max Profit
+$4334.22
Max Loss
-$100.00
Shares
4434.2

A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.

Market Info

Condition ID
0xcf36f58f...1d8989
Slug
spl-haz-nsr-2026-11-06-exact-score-0-0
Trade on Polymarket